Performance Max Is Cannibalizing Your Meta Winners (Here's the Fix)

Spending over $50,000+ / month on ads but not seeing the results you hoped for? We’re currently taking on 2 brands for Q4 to help them scale and hit their goals. If you’re looking for a better option for growing your brand, let’s chat. Book a Call Today 

Performance Max launched with promises of simplified campaign management and automated optimization across Google's entire inventory…

However for many advertisers, it delivered the opposite. 

Instead of complementing existing campaigns…

Performance Max often competes directly with your proven Meta campaigns for the same customers… and most of the time it’s at higher costs. 

Google's automated bidding doesn't know you're already reaching that customer through Facebook at a $15 CPA when it bids $35 for the SAME person on YouTube. 

The result? 

Your total customer acquisition costs spike while Google celebrates "improved performance" in its isolated reporting. 

In this email, we're breaking down: 

• The budget allocation errors that happen when Performance Max competes with Meta campaigns 

• How to audit cross-platform audience overlap and identify inflated acquisition costs 

• The defense system that prevents platform cannibalization 

Let’s dive in:

The Cross-Platform Competition Problem 

Performance Max operates with Google's machine learning, making real-time decisions across Search, YouTube, Display, and Shopping without considering your broader marketing ecosystem. 

Meanwhile, your Meta campaigns target similar audiences with proven creative that convert at known costs. 

When both platforms bid for the same customer simultaneously, you end up paying twice for one conversion opportunity. 

And then, the numbers get ugly quickly…

• Meta's average CPC across industries is $1.88 compared to Google's $4.66. 

• Performance Max campaigns often show 12-22% higher ROAS than traditional Google campaigns, but that improvement becomes meaningless if you're duplicating audience reach at 2-3x the cost of your Meta campaigns.

Auditing Cross-Platform Audience Overlap 

Most advertisers launch Performance Max campaigns without analyzing how they'll interact with existing Meta spend, creating immediate budget competition. 

• Customer Journey Analysis

Track the same customer across platforms using email matching or customer ID systems. 

Look for cases where Performance Max conversions happen within days of Meta touchpoints. 

This indicates direct competition rather than complementary reach. 

• Cost Per Acquisition Comparison

Compare acquisition costs for similar audience segments across platforms. 

If Performance Max is acquiring customers at significantly higher costs than Meta for the same demographics, you're experiencing cannibalization rather than expansion. 

• Attribution Window Overlap

Analyze conversion paths where customers engage with both Performance Max and Meta campaigns within attribution windows. 

Multiple platform touches for the same conversion often indicate wasted spend rather than synergistic marketing. 

The goal isn't to eliminate one platform, but to identify where they're fighting each other instead of working together to expand your customer base.

Cross-Platform Budget Defense System Implementation 

• Audience Exclusion Strategy

Use customer match lists to exclude your highest-value Meta audiences from Performance Max targeting. 

If you're successfully acquiring customers through Meta at lower costs, don't let Performance Max compete for the same people at higher prices. 

• Geographic and Demographic Segmentation

Allocate Performance Max to geographic markets or demographic segments where Meta performance is weaker. 

This creates complementary reach rather than competitive overlap. 

• Bid Adjustment Coordination

Monitor when both platforms are active in the same auctions and adjust Performance Max bids to avoid inflating costs. 

Use dayparting to separate platform activities when possible. 

• Campaign Scheduling Alignment

Run Performance Max campaigns during periods when Meta performance historically dips…

Or use different scheduling strategies to minimize simultaneous bidding on the same audiences. 

• Budget Allocation Based on Proven Performance

Allocate 70% of new budget to platforms and campaigns with proven unit economics before expanding to automated solutions like Performance Max.

Let Performance Max earn budget through demonstrated incremental results, not platform promises.

Shoppers check tracking pages 4.6x per order (even higher during the holidays!), but most brands are wasting this traffic by sending them to basic carrier pages.

Why peak season changes everything: When acquisition costs spike and inboxes overflow, transactional touchpoints become one of your most cost-effective engagement tools.

*Transactional emails vs traditional marketing emails

Tracking isn’t just logistics, it’s a retention engine that delivers 10x stronger site return than traditional campaigns. See how in Loop’s Peak Season Guide: Driving Repeat Purchases through Transactional Touchpoints, featuring:

• → The untapped ROI of transactional touchpoints 

• → Visual examples from top-performing brands

• → The core emails, SMS, and tracking page elements you need for peak season

Grab your free copy today!

Want to learn more? Connect with me on social 👇
Twitter - LinkedIn - Instagram - Threads

Thank you for reading! I appreciate you.

Need some additional 1:1 support? Book a call with me directly.

Disclaimer: Special thanks to Loop Returns for sponsoring today’s newsletter.